Skip to content

relnotes: Rustdoc is a header #861

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 21, 2025
Merged

Conversation

lolbinarycat
Copy link
Contributor

@lolbinarycat lolbinarycat commented May 26, 2025

also bump source permalink

Rendered

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented May 26, 2025

r? @Dylan-DPC

rustbot has assigned @Dylan-DPC.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label May 26, 2025
@apiraino
Copy link
Contributor

@lolbinarycat why add Rustdoc only? I count now 12 items in the changelog header, would it make sense mentioning them all?

(if I understand correctly the connection between that code and this page of the forge)

@lolbinarycat
Copy link
Contributor Author

Rustdoc was the only one i noticed was missing.

also, i only count 10, not 12?

@apiraino
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, 10 (sorry)

Copy link
Contributor

@apiraino apiraino left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! Feel free to rebase and squash the commits.

@lolbinarycat
Copy link
Contributor Author

@apiraino squashed and rebased.

@apiraino apiraino merged commit 3986be0 into rust-lang:master Jun 21, 2025
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants